back to top
HomeCheerful TalksWhat It Means to Shape Your Own Space After Prison

What It Means to Shape Your Own Space After Prison

This story was originally published by Reasons to be Cheerful

11 min read

Two cubes of pale wood sit on either side of a small, accessible lounge. Inside each, a bed folds down from the wall, a desk swings out and shelves hold books, plants and family photos. But nobody lives here — at least, not yet.

What I and dozens of other visitors are looking at is the Mobile Refuge Room installation at the Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum’s Making Home exhibition — trauma-informed transitional housing created with, and by, formerly incarcerated people and the architecture firm Designing Justice + Designing Spaces (DJDS).

The act of imagining new rooms and landscapes can help people process trauma in real time. Credit: Tolu Olasoji

The space is clutter-free and the modular nature of the rooms enables them to be staged differently, as has been done here. It looks simple, but it offers what most halfway houses still withhold: the ability to shape your space, decide who comes in, and ultimately close the door behind you.

“Decent housing is foundational to a successful transition home,” says abolitionist architect and DJDS cofounder Deanna Van Buren. Too often, she argues, that foundation is missing. 

A Department of Justice study of more than 90,000 people released from state prisons across 34 states in 2012 found that 62 percent had been rearrested within three years, rising to 71 percent within five. 

“The ability to secure housing and employment is the cornerstone of successful reintegration,” says Lila Kazemian, a criminology professor at CUNY researching desistance, the process of abstaining from crime by those with a previous pattern of offending.

Yet housing remains one of the most fragile parts of that equation. People with criminal records are still excluded from many rentals and public housing programs. Van Buren notes that formerly incarcerated people remain effectively an “unprotected class” in housing, which means discrimination is easy and consequences are rare. The National Inventory of the Collateral Consequences of Conviction documents more than 44,000 legal restrictions on people with criminal records across U.S. jurisdictions, many related to housing.

With these restrictions, many people coming home from prison are left with crowded shelters, profit-driven reentry hostels, or the couches of already stressed relatives. For-profit prison companies run some of the largest reentry housing programs, often packing people into dorms because “that’s how they make a profit,” as Van Buren puts it.

In those spaces, you are watched. Your bed is assigned. Your roommate is assigned. Your schedule is assigned. The built environment continues the logic of incarceration, even after you’ve supposedly left it.

In a former life, Van Buren was a globetrotting architect working on large, complex developments across several continents. Over time, she clocked the same jarring panorama: “You’re doing this huge development, and right next to it are these slums,” she recalls. “Why are we only designing for rich people?”

The real pivot came when she heard acclaimed civil rights activists Angela Davis and Fania Davis speak in Oakland about restorative justice. “I’d never heard of it before,” she says. “I was sitting there thinking, I want to design for that.” When she went looking for examples of spaces built for peacemaking and repair instead of courts and cages, she found almost nothing. 

The journey to exhibiting at the Cooper Hewitt was a collaborative one for Van Buren, the foundations of which were laid in a cross-disciplinary partnership she and restorative justice scholar Barb Toews forged over a decade ago. They taught a course in a Pennsylvania prison consisting of 10 Haverford College students and 10 incarcerated men, asking participants to envision what spaces for healing might look like.

As participants created collages and small models, Toews noticed something else happening: The act of imagining new rooms and landscapes was helping people process trauma in real time, not in spite of the design work but through it. Design became the catalyst for talking about safety, fear, shame and hope, without asking people to start with words.

A wooden fold-down desk and chair.
The Mobile Refuge Room offers the ability to shape your space, decide who comes in, and ultimately close the door behind you. Credit: Tolu Olasoji

Years later in Oakland, DJDS teamed up with a Black church and a reentry program provider to imagine a full reentry campus and, within it, a different kind of room. Dozens of formerly incarcerated people joined community workshops; a core group became the design team now known as Designers on Deck. In those sessions, held in church halls, they sketched, argued over details and built cardboard models that eventually became the full-scale plywood prototype that was on display at the Cooper Hewitt.

The Pennsylvania prison experience also shaped how Van Buren now talks about her own role. “I’ve never been incarcerated,” she says. “My job as the architect is to translate your needs and values into physical form. You already know what you want. You already know what you need in an environment.”

As a result, people who have lived through incarceration are treated as the experts, while the architect’s job is to listen, teach just enough design language and help bring their ideas into physical form. 

Credit: Tolu Olasoji

Helping people who have been confined and stripped of control toward a calmer nervous system often starts with what might seem intangible. Things like being able to close a door or control the light switch make a real difference.

The modular Mobile Refuge Room concept itself emerged from participants wrestling with the cost of building in California cities. The fold-down desk, the Murphy bed, the drawer configuration — Van Buren is explicit that these weren’t her ideas. “This was all them,” she says, gesturing to the specific features inside the unit. “You can see it in the video where they built it out of cardboard. We just did what they told us to.”

Wayne Boatwright, a former attorney who worked on refining the Mobile Refuge Room’s narrative, business planning and intellectual property, describes people leaving prison as stuck in a “state of hypervigilance,” wired for threat after years of constant stress. He speaks from personal experience. “It took me over two years to be able to fully sleep,” he says. “Prison is all hard edges and echo. There is nothing soft; the noise is sharp.” 

A view through a sliding wooden door of a Murphy bed.
The fold-down desk, the Murphy bed, the drawer configuration — these all came from a core group of formerly incarcerated people who helped develop the design. Credit: Tolu Olasoji

Research shows that between 30 and 60 percent of formerly incarcerated men meet criteria for PTSD, 10 times more than the general male population. A separate study found that, for women incarcerated in state prisons, over a third experienced childhood abuse, and over half identified traumatic events in their lives before incarceration.

Trauma, Toews notes, is stored in the body, and “the environment can either escalate someone into a survival state or support their regulation.” Helping people who have been confined and stripped of control toward a calmer nervous system often starts with what might seem intangible. 

Some of the most powerful shifts those participating in Van Buren and Toews’ workshops to date have named are simply being able to close their own door, see who is coming and going, control the light switch and choose where to sit or how close to be to an exit. Even something like slamming the door when you are upset, Toews was told in a workshop, can be a way of saying “leave me alone” instead of having to fight or shut down.

The Mobile Refuge Room bakes those principles into plywood and hardware. And here, the absence of things is as important as what’s present. No steel bunk frames. No fluorescent glare. No guard station in the middle of the room. No forced roommate.

Notably, nature-inspired patterns such as leaves are cut out of the structure’s wood using lasers. Van Buren says they evoke something organic while also reducing panel weight and acting as integrated handles, no extra hardware needed. Those choices soften the space, save material and keep costs down. “This is all digitally fabricated,” she explains. It can be tweaked, recut, flat-packed and assembled elsewhere.

DJDS works with FORMR, a Bay Area fabrication shop that employs returning citizens. They fabricated several of the smaller elements inside the rooms – planters, bookends, laptop tables – though not the units themselves. 

FORMR’s goal, founder Sasha Plotitsa says, was to “help bring the vision of a calming, restorative space to life through simple, durable, human-centered objects.” 

The Mobile Refuge Room is still in pilot phase, says Garrett Jacobs, DJDS’s director of strategic partnerships. Since the Cooper Hewitt exhibit ended, the two units have moved elsewhere in NYC, one to the Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice and one to the Pratt Institute’s Interdisciplinary Technology Lab, where the design is being refined for manufacturing and scale.

A small model of the Mobile Refuge Room.
The Mobile Refuge Room design is currently being refined for manufacturing and scale. Credit: Tolu Olasoji

Back in Oakland, the team is working out a business model that revolves around the people the room is built for. Any future partnership, Jacobs says, has to balance affordability with a workforce that includes people with lived experience of incarceration.

DJDS is clear-eyed about what it will take to move from prototype to actual housing. New York’s regulatory landscape, from permits and safety codes to accessibility rules and insurance, still has to be navigated, and some of that may drive small design changes depending on the building and site. 

That is the reason DJDS does not see itself as a product company shipping prefab pods; instead, it plans to bundle design services into any pilot and work through execution alongside the service provider that will actually run the program. The immediate goal is to have six to 10 units fabricated and installed by year-end, with a focus on getting a northeast pilot right before answering bigger questions about impact and how quickly the model can travel.

Credit: Tolu Olasoji

To restorative justice scholar Barb Toews, the room is both a physical prototype and test case for what trauma-responsive reentry space could look like if designed from the nervous system outward.

On cost, Jacobs argues, the Mobile Refuge Room sits in an in-between space. Compared to large dorm-style rooms filled with bunk beds, an individual unit is more expensive per person. But when it is inserted into an existing building, it can be more affordable than constructing fully separate rooms with new walls and bathrooms. 

Toews maintains that focusing only on recidivism numbers misses several layers: whether people feel safe enough, physically and emotionally, to stay on the reintegration path. From her perspective, the room is both a physical prototype and test case for what trauma-responsive reentry space could look like if designed from the nervous system outward.

Jacobs points to the work itself as part of the project’s earliest outcomes. In Oakland, people with lived experience of incarceration were paid to help design, document and legally protect the project. That includes Designers on Deck participants who moved from workshops into design and digital fabrication roles, as well as collaborators like Boatwright. 

Halfway through our call, Boatwright pauses. “I’m cat-sitting at my daughter’s,” he says, as his ex-wife calls to arrange a drop-off. “Can I call you back?” When he does, he’s talking about rebuilding trust with his family after decades inside; the everyday work that policy metrics don’t capture. “We all have our own path up the mountain,” he says. “I chose a harder one, but I’m still trying to get up it.”


Wait, you’re not a member yet?

Join the Reasons to be Cheerful community by supporting our nonprofit publication and giving what you can.


Cancel anytime

Professor Kazemian says that kind of progress matters as much as any headline number. “It’s very difficult to focus on self-betterment and desistance from crime when basic needs aren’t met,” she says.

Van Buren is careful not to oversell what the Mobile Refuge Room can do. It cannot, on its own, undo decades of exclusion or repair the harms of incarceration. But it can interrupt something more basic: the assumption that the first space someone enters after prison must feel like a continuation of punishment.

“We don’t need to keep punishing people,” she says.

The post What It Means to Shape Your Own Space After Prison appeared first on Reasons to be Cheerful.



Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments